Why does Jason turn from Meadea to Glauce? What is its outcome?/Is Jason fully responsible for the tragedy of Medea?

 


In Euripides' play "Medea," Jason is portrayed as the protagonist's antagonist, responsible for her tragic downfall. The play begins with Medea's desire for revenge against Jason for betraying her and leaving her for another woman, Glauce. In this essay, we will examine why Jason turns from Medea to Glauce, the outcome of his decision, and whether he is fully responsible for the tragedy of Medea.

Jason's decision to marry Glauce instead of staying with Medea is rooted in his desire for power and status. Glauce is the daughter of King Creon, and marrying her would solidify Jason's position in Corinthian society. Jason argues that marrying Glauce would benefit Medea and their children as well, as they would be able to stay in Corinth and enjoy the protection of the royal family. However, Medea sees this as a betrayal and is outraged that Jason would abandon her for a political marriage.

The outcome of Jason's decision to marry Glauce is catastrophic. Medea is consumed with rage and jealousy, and she devises a plan to take revenge on Jason by killing their children and Glauce. Her actions result in a tragedy that leaves Jason without a family, reputation, or hope for the future. He is left alone on stage, his hopes and dreams shattered, while Medea escapes to Athens to start a new life.

Jason is not fully responsible for the tragedy of Medea, as Medea is ultimately responsible for her own actions. However, Jason's actions are the catalyst for the tragic events that follow. Jason's decision to marry Glauce instead of staying with Medea is a betrayal, and it causes Medea to feel abandoned and betrayed. His desire for power and status blinds him to the emotional pain he is causing Medea and his children, and he fails to consider the consequences of his actions.

Jason is also responsible for failing to recognize the depth of Medea's anger and resentment towards him. He underestimates her capacity for revenge and fails to see the danger of provoking her. His arrogance and lack of empathy towards Medea ultimately lead to his downfall, as he is unable to understand her motivations and fails to take her threats seriously.

Furthermore, Jason's decision to marry Glauce highlights the gender inequalities present in ancient Greek society. Women in ancient Greece were often viewed as objects to be traded for political gain, and Jason's decision to marry Glauce is a reflection of this. By prioritizing his own ambitions over Medea's feelings, Jason reinforces the patriarchal system that limits women's agency and autonomy.

In conclusion, Jason's decision to marry Glauce instead of staying with Medea is a significant factor in the tragedy that unfolds in Euripides' play. His desire for power and status blinds him to the emotional pain he is causing Medea and his children, and he fails to consider the consequences of his actions. While Jason is not fully responsible for the tragedy of Medea, his actions are a catalyst for the events that follow. Jason's behavior also highlights the gender inequalities present in ancient Greek society, making him a complex and flawed character in the play.

Biplob Prodhan

Biplob Prodhan from Bangladesh ; founded an online platform named EDNOUB for the students of English Language & Literature. You are invited here.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post

Contact Form